Last night was our September board meeting (which we moved to October, due to Ruby Dance. We then moved our October meeting to Nov. 2nd becoming our November October meeting, and we'll close up shop for the year with a joint November-December meeting in December. Confused?!) which was used to review and discuss Ruby Dance results.
The overall verdict is that the event was very successful. We beat our financial goals and had very good attendance in a down year. We've gotten plenty of feedback that the event was very enjoyable. The new items - a live auction and paddle raise - were quite successful.
Of course, it wasn't perfect, and we want to learn from the mistakes and challenges, and try to make the following year's event. We spent some time listing the things that didn't work out as positively as we'd liked. We'll take the pluses and minuses back to our event steering committee, mull things over and make recommendations for RD 2010.
There really isn't much of a gap between the end of one event and the beginning of planning for next year's event.
From flood of support to real world flooding: Keith Ervin writes about the challenges Howard Hanson Dam (and everything downstream) is facing. The details of the decisions on how to construct the dam, and the history that's led up to where we are today, is rather fascinating for this water-bug. Two factors in this story are very interesting to me:
1) The decision in the 1950s to build the dam with the existing earthen abutment and leave the issue of what to do with (the quite real possibility of) leaks that might occur to future generations (aka "us").
2) The cumulative decisions by government and individuals to populate the Green River floodplain. Even though that in itself isn't remarkable - its a pattern as old as human history - in the current situation, with the potential for serious flooding looming, it's worth looking at that floodplain, and asking ourselves whether we've overlooked the natural systems
The City of Seattle is re-mapping its creeks' floodplains. Because I don't spend much time there, I don't really think of Seattle as having creeks. But i have toured quite a bit of the Thornton Creek Watershed (thanks to Rocky), and they've got the same dynamic (though on a much smaller scale) as the Green River. Houses are built right next to the creek. Yards run right up to the creek. Bank armoring is plentiful to defend against erosion.
The challenge for urban floodplains (and let's face it, much of the Green River floodplain is), is now that we have people living (and working) in large numbers in the path of the 100-year, or even 10-year storm, how do we make the best of the situation. Can we re-strike the balance between flood functions and flood management?